Evaluation of ICT Preparedness in Public Secondary Schools: A Comparative Study of Public Boarding and Day Secondary Schools in the South Rift Region in Kenya
Abstract
It is now widely acknowledged that a fundamental role for schools is to prepare learners with skills relevant to the challenges of the 21st century through acquisition of suitable knowledge and skills. The centrality of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) as an essential skill in the new world order cannot be gainsaid. In view of this, majority of developing countries are reviewing their education policies to align instructional curricula offered in schools with knowledge and skills that incorporate competencies in ICT. However, despite the acclaimed centrality of ICT, there are indications that public secondary schools in the South Rift Region of Kenya, are slowin putting in place the necessary infrastructure to support implementation of ICT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ICT preparedness in public day and boarding secondary schools in the South Rift Region in Kenya. The study was guided by the following objectives, to; find out if public secondary schools have trained ICT personnel and find out the infrastructural preparedness in the implementation of ICT in public secondary schools in the South Rift Region in Kenya. The target population for the study comprised 69 teachers in public secondary schools in the South Rift Region of Kenya who were attending a Strengthening of Mathematics and Science in Secondary Education (SMASSE) training. The study employed the census technique to include the entire population into the study because the universe was a manageable number. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study established that availability of trained ICT teachers in public secondary schools in the study locale was average and availability of ICT technicians was low in public secondary schools in the South Rift Region. It had been hypothesized that there was no statistically significant difference in the level of ICT preparedness in boarding and day secondary schools in the South Rift Region in Kenya. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was computed and yielded a p-value = .261 which was more than the alpha value α > 0.05 indicating that the differences in ICT preparedness in the two school categories were not statistically significant. Therefore, the null hypothesis was accepted and it was concluded that the preparedness of schools to implement ICT infrastructure in boarding, and day secondary schools were largely the same. The study recommends the need to promote the use of ICT in all school categories and in particular the day secondary schools. This implies the need for sensitization of all stakeholders and provision of resources to develop ICT infrastructure and training of personnel in public secondary schools in Kenya.
References
Atyang, F., Gathumbi, A., & Babusa, H. (2018). School management and technical support to teachers and students in the integration of ICT in teaching/learning English language. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(7), 249-258.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Statistical language - census and sample.http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/a3121120.nsf/home/statistical+language++census+and+sample.
Becta, (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. Available from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/barriers.pdf
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Edefiogho, D. H. (2005). Information and communication technology and overall development: New frontiers Shekinah home coming. Nsukka: Stanzero Printers.
Flanagan, L. & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (2), 124-142.
Gyamfi, S. A. (2016). Identifying Ghanaian Pre-Service Teachers' Readiness for Computer Use: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 12 (2), 105-122.
Hepp, K. P., Hinostroza, S. E., Laval, M. E., & Rehbein, L. F. (2004). Technology in schools: Education, ICT and the knowledge society OECD. Available at www.worldbank.org/education/pdf/ICT_report_oct04a.pdf retrieved on 10 August 2012
Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology Integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to Policy Makers. International Journal, 6(4), 464-483.
Katulo, M. M. (2010). An investigation of the role of principals in promoting computer usage in selected schools in Namibia. Unpublished Masters of Education dissertation: Rhodes University.
KICD (2016). Report on needs assessment for school curriculum in Kenya https://kicd.ac.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Needs-Assessment-Rpt-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf
Kirschner, P. A. (2003), Reviews: 6. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 378-379.
Kovalchick, A. & Dawson, K. (2004). Education and technology: An encyclopedia. California: ABC-CLIO.
Kozma, R. (2005). National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development. Human Technology, 5(4), 358-367.
NCREL. (2000). Critical Issue: Providing professional development for effective technology use. http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy/te1000.htm
Newby, T.J, Stepich, D.A, Lehman, J.D., Russel, J.D., & Leftwich, A.O. (2011). Educational technology for teaching and learning. Newyork: Pearson.
Newhouse, C. P. (2002). Literature review: The impact of ICT on learning and teaching. Specialist educational services. http://www.infodev.org.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the internet in democratic societies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Rogers, F. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 171-185.
Surbhi, S. (2016). Difference between census and sampling. https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-census-and-sampling.html
Tonui, B., Kerich, E., & Koross, R. (2016). An investigation into implementation ofICT in primary schools in Kenya in the light of free laptops at primary one: A case study of teachers implementing ICT into their teaching practice. Journal of education and Practice, 7(13), 12–16 https:// eric. ed. gov/? id= EJ110 2802.
Trust, T. (2018): From teaching with technology to using technology to empower learners. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 1–3
Yildrim, S. (2007). Effects of an educational computing course on pre-service and in-service teachers: A discussion on attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32(4), 479-495.
Tong M, Trinidad S. (2005). Conditions and Constraints of Sustainable Innovative Pedagogical Practices Using Technology. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning; 9(3).
World Bank Group. (2017). Promising approaches in early childhood development: Early childhood development interventions from around the world. Washington, DC: WorldBank
Yilmaz, N. P. (2011). Evaluation of the Technology Integration Process in the Turkish Education System. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(1), 37-54.
Zaman, M, Shamim, R, & Clement, K. (2011). Trends and issues to integrate ICT in teaching learning for the future world of education. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 11(3) 114-119.
