Predictive Modelling of Human - Elephant Conflicts in Shimba Hills Ecosystem

  • Jennifer N. Wanyingi Department of Wildlife Management, School of Natural Resource Management, University of Eldoret, P. O. Box 1125 – 30100, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Ben Mwasi Department of Environmental Planning, Management and Coordination, School of Environmental Studies, University of Eldoret, P. O. Box 1125 – 30100, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Jim K. Kairu Department of Wildlife Management, School of Natural Resource Management, University of Eldoret, P. O. Box 1125 – 30100, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Johnstone K. Kimanzi Department of Wildlife Management, School of Natural Resource Management, University of Eldoret, P. O. Box 1125 – 30100, Eldoret, Kenya
Keywords: Human-Elephant Conflict, Predictive Modelling, Shimba Hills Ecosystem

Abstract

Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a key example of the growing competition between people and wildlife for space and resources in Kenya. To effectively implement mitigation measures, understanding of the underlying factors that determine HEC is required. This study mapped the conflict prone areas in Shimba Hills (SH) Ecosystem. The study used questionnaires, group discussions and available Shimba Hills National Reserve (SHNR) conflict records to gather information on the nature, type and conflict locations (presence data). GIS-based stepwise logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between the conflict areas and the selected habitat factors including distance to roads, distances to fenced and unfenced areas, distance to water, distance to settlements, slope, elevation and the land cover types. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the presence data of conflict sites and absence data (non-conflict sites). Random points were generated in the study area to represent absence data of conflicts. Results showed that distances to water (β= -0.0012, P=0.000), fence (β= -0.0006, P=0.000), roads (β=0.0005, P=0.016) and settlements (β=0.0002, P=0.037) were significant determinants of HEC. Areas near water, near fence, away from road and settlements were prone to conflicts. The four significant variables were used to generate conflict prone area map. The study successfully identi fied and mapped prone areas for elephant. Such maps are of practical and strategic use to wildlife managers in the SHNR. The study recommended community awareness programs. The programs will educate and involve the community on early detection of HEC and the necessary mitigation measure required

References

Balmford A., Moore J.L., Brooks T ., Burgess N., Hansen L.A., Williams P. and Rahbek, C. (2001). Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291, 2616–19.

Barnes, R.F.W., Hema, E.M., Nandjui, A., Manford, M., Dubiure, U.F., Danquah, E., & Boafo, Y., (2005). Risk of crop raiding elephants around the Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana. Pachyderm 39, 19 25

De Beers, Y., & Van Aarde, R. J., (2008). Do landscape heterogeneity and water distributionexplain aspects of elephants home range in Southern Africa‘s arid savannas? Journal for Arid environments‟ (72), 2017 -2025.

Field, A. P. (2000). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for the Begin ner. Sage Publications, London.

Graham M., Wren, S. & Adams, W. M. (2009). Laikipia Elephant Project {online}. http://www.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/heccapacity/LaikipiaPaper3.pdf . Accessed on 11/07/2013.

Haynes G. (2011).Elephants (and extinct relatives) as earth -movers and ecosystem engineers. Geomorphology doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.045.

Hoare, R. E. & Du T oit, J. T . (1999). Coexistence between people and elephants in African savannas. Conservation. Biol. 13, 633– 639.

Hoare, R.E. (2000). African elephants and humans in conflict: the outlook for co -existence. Oryx 34(1), 34-38.

Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistics regression. New York: John Wiley and sons,

Hoare, R.E. & DuT oit, J.T. (1999). Coexistence between people and elephants in African savannahs. ConservBiol 13, 633–639

Kahumbu, P. (2002).T hesis. The effects of elephants on their habitats in the Shimb a Hills. Princeton University.

Kenyaweb (2001). Early Settlements & Migration. Nairobi. 2007. http://www.kenyaweb.com/history/settlements/index.html

Kiiru, W. (1995). "T he current status of human-elephant conflict in Kenya." Pachyderm 19, 15-20.

Kiiru, W. (1996). "Management options for Shimba Hills Elephants after fencing of the reserve." Pachyderm 22.

Knickerbocker, T. & Waithaka, J. (2005). People and Elephants in Shimba Hills, Kenya In R. Woodroffe, S. T hirgood and A. Rabinowitz. People and Wildlife: Conflict or Co -existence? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kyale D.M, Ngene, S. & Maingi, J. (2006).Boiphysical and human factors determine the distribution of poached elephant in T savo East National park, Kenya. Pachyderm No.49.Jan –June 2011.

Leuthold, W. & Sale, J.B (1973). Movements and patterns of habitat utilization of elephants in T savo National Park, Kenya. E AfrWildl J 11, 369–384

Litoroh, M. (2003). The effectiveness and challenges of the Shimba Hills and Mwaluganji Electric Fence. Unpublished paper presented at a workshop to evaluate the effectiveness and challenges of electric fences in Kenya, at Masinga Dam Lodge on 28th-29th April 2003.

Luke Q. (2005). "Annotated Checklist of the Plants of the Shimba Hills, Kwale District, Kenya." Journal of East African Natural History 94(1), 5-120.

Menard, S. (2010). Logistic Regression: From Introductory to Advanced Concepts and Applications. T housand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mutinda, P. Omondi, & Litoroh, M. (1996). T ranslocation of elephants: the Kenyan experience. Pachyderm 22, 61-65.

Naughton – Treves, L .(1998). Predicting Patterns of Crop damage by Wildlife around KibaleNational Park, Uganda. Cons. Biol.
12(1), 156- 168.
Published
2018-08-27
How to Cite
Wanyingi, J. N., Mwasi, B., Kairu, J. K., & Kimanzi, J. K. (2018, August 27). Predictive Modelling of Human - Elephant Conflicts in Shimba Hills Ecosystem. African Journal of Education,Science and Technology, 1(2), pp 163-172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2022/ajest.v1i2.179
Section
Articles